Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
helwen: (Tower)
Still haven't ordered shoes, but maybe I'll make a decision on that in the next week or so. Have an appt. with the curator at AHS for next Friday morning to look at some clothing. Going to bring along a vintage jacket I have for her to look at also, and hopefully give me a timeframe for it.

She wants to add to the clothing collection over time, going up and including the 1960s. Don't think I have much that would help, but I might.... kid's clothing of course, but that's probably okay.

I'm thinking I might fit the jacket I want her to look at, after I've lost a bit more weight. If it goes back to the 1940's I could indulge in a pair of stockings with the seam up the back, like these, but I'm expecting it'll probably be 1950's. Well, I'll find out next week.

Reconstructing History has this fascinating book on Hairstyling, 1930s-1960s -- don't know if I'll need it, but I was watching an old movie the other day that reminded me that they carry this book.

And then, going back to my current project of putting together an outfit for demoing at the historical society, 18th century patterns of interest to me:
Rev War Gentleman Package

and then the Polonaise has always been of interest to me.

And of course, the Stays to go under that...

***
At this point I expect I'll start with something very basic and see how things go -- besides, I'm losing weight and changing shape, so something fitted is just going to have to wait until things stabilize a bit more. I might make simple stays to start with no straps, and leave any boning out on the sides, to make re-fitting it easier on me. Stays (like a corset, only different, but has stiffeners in it) were more for smoothing out the silhouette than for cinching in the waist. I've also seen references to it being useful for working women, as a back support while lifting heavy things -- like the kidney belt for a weight-lifter. I've worn this sort of thing before, many years ago when I wore early Tudor; made properly, it's quite comfortable.

***
At some point this summer, I'd also like to go to the Bryan Homestead. Home of William Cullen Bryant, it isn't far from here -- just over in Cummington, in fact:

Bryant Homestead

That's an early-mid 19th c. place, but it's close by, so could be a nice way to spend the day.
helwen: (Tower)
Franklin County History

Excerpts online from a book composed in 1879 by Louis H. Everts.
helwen: (Default)
I like the Polonaise, but would a woman wearing a dress of this style be spinning or weaving?

Apparently preferred fabric choices for this style would be wool or silk. I could see it with wool, but silk, not so much. Cotton was also in use in the 1770s, and still pre-abolitionist so no complications there... but would cotton have been used for a Polonaise?
helwen: (Default)
Didn't do farmers market Saturday - haying, etc.

***
Celebrated with the grove yesterday, after the initiations of a couple from Ohio. Both ceremonies were excellent :) Some interesting chats after, staying longer than we expected. Did not go to Taste of Amherst but I'm sure that was lovely too.

Time to sort through and find a few seeds that are supposed to be planted in July/August, and put the rest back in the fridge.

***
Think I've settled on later 18th c. for local demo outfit -- having a resource for decent shoes was definitely one factor in that decision, plus since I'll be spinning and maybe eventually weaving, I'd rather be pre-industrial revolution. Plus if the town ever does any 1776-type stuff, I'd be all set for that too... stays have been the holdup for me, since I'm losing weight and changing shape, but I'll worry about that later -- skirts and a jacket will probably do for now. I'd love to make a Polonaise, but not sure I can justify something that fancy-looking for working in. Still, I'd like to go higher class rather than lower, as I'd just as soon use the same foundation garment for "Sunday best" as for working, rather than two entirely different outfits.

Learning things like apparently linen wasn't used for outer petticoats unless you're poor -- wool or silk more common. Although apparently by later 18th c., cotton was also an option... there were in fact abolitionists in Ashfield, but that would be more of a factor in the 19th century.


Been reading some at this site: 18th Century New England Life... not the end all and be all of 18th c. living of course, but seeing as I live in New England, seemed like a reasonable place to start.

***
Learned some nifty stuff at the historical society Saturday, and shared some knowledge too. Thought it was fascinating that silk used direct from China back then was more durably made than American silk. The reason was that the Americans were using a process to weight the silk that suffused the material with metal! So over time the metal caused the silk to rot -- probably a side effect of oxidizing?

***
Belated Happy Father's Day to all the fathers out there!

***
This morning we'll be going for a walk. L's company is doing some sort of walking thing, with the different branches of the company competing for number of miles put in over x-amount of time. Naturally I'll be going along, even though my miles won't count :)

Profile

helwen: (Default)
helwen

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 30th, 2025 12:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios