Presidential Crap
Mar. 10th, 2008 09:47 amMy mother is pro-Clinton, so I get to hear stories and reasons from her on why Clinton's good or Obama's bad. The only one I've managed to retain is from when she goes to read for an older couple (ages 98 and 101). They're from Germany originally, and fled the country in the 1930s to get away from Hitler and his rhetoric. They are terrified that Obama will win, because his rhetoric and campaign methods are so much like Hitler's (he even has a huge youth following). Lots of promises, no substance.
My mother has tried to reassure them that even if Obama wins, the U.S. government isn't the same as Germany's was.... of course, the U.S. government wasn't what it used to be either, not nearly as protective of its citizens as it used to be.
Then I have the pro-Obama people, and the anti-Clinton people. Yes, he has more experience than the Clinton campaign is giving him credit for. And for the people who think being first lady doesn't count for anything, it depends on the lady. She can't introduce or get bills passed directly, but several first ladies in history have gotten a lot done. To know for sure, one has to do actual research. Eleanore Roosevelt was never a senator, but she had a huge effect on this country. So did others. A general rant that being first lady doesn't count for anything is as meaningless as the Clinton campaign saying Obama doesn't have enough experience.
Anyway, if both campaigns believe so much that experience counts, they should all vote for McCain. He certainly has experience....
As for me, I don't care for any of them.
My mother has tried to reassure them that even if Obama wins, the U.S. government isn't the same as Germany's was.... of course, the U.S. government wasn't what it used to be either, not nearly as protective of its citizens as it used to be.
Then I have the pro-Obama people, and the anti-Clinton people. Yes, he has more experience than the Clinton campaign is giving him credit for. And for the people who think being first lady doesn't count for anything, it depends on the lady. She can't introduce or get bills passed directly, but several first ladies in history have gotten a lot done. To know for sure, one has to do actual research. Eleanore Roosevelt was never a senator, but she had a huge effect on this country. So did others. A general rant that being first lady doesn't count for anything is as meaningless as the Clinton campaign saying Obama doesn't have enough experience.
Anyway, if both campaigns believe so much that experience counts, they should all vote for McCain. He certainly has experience....
As for me, I don't care for any of them.
yep :-\
Date: 2008-03-10 02:10 pm (UTC)Oh goodie. THAT is sure to help matters...
Re: yep :-\
Date: 2008-03-10 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 02:35 pm (UTC)As for John Mccain, he is pretty much off anyone's radar over here. Too low key and then there is the Bush connection..................
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 02:51 pm (UTC)Just once, I'd like to have someone really worth voting for. sigh. Although as one person put it, at least we don't seem to have Huckabee as a possibility anymore :P
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 03:14 pm (UTC)Obama I only have a problem with because I can't see any follow through in his resume. If he had waited until after he had finished even one term as Senator, I would feel a lot better. I feel like he is going for the bigger cookie without fulfilling the duties and obligations of the one he already has.
Clinton has problems, yes. I won't deny that, but for me, her problems are a lot less, ummm, volatile? dangerous? than the others.
I will vote for whatever democrat gets the nomination, I would just feel better if it were Clinton.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 03:24 pm (UTC)on Obama, there is some definite misinformation going on -- one person posted this supposed record of his having worked on various things (and vote record too), going back 8 years. Not as a U.S. senator, obviously...
Yup, my mom favors Clinton because she has some actual plans.
If the Dems want to beat the Republicans, having Clinton and Obama team up is their best bet.